Compare
Deep Dive runs multiple scans on one domain. Compare is for power users and companies that need multiple scans across multiple domains, with side-by-side ring gauge scores, selected evidence lanes, and a table view that makes differences obvious.
Compare starts with the setup controls, then turns the selected scanners and selected domains into a table: score gauges first, retrieved evidence rows below, and enough horizontal depth to show that the portal can keep going across more domain slots.
Power-user comparison
Compare is built for the moment when a single score is not enough. Agencies can line up client sites. Procurement teams can compare vendor domains. Accessibility teams can see remediation candidates together. Product and security teams can review trust, privacy, supplier, SEO, and accessibility evidence in one table.
The key is control: pick the domains, pick the scan lanes, pick the date window, then read the score rings and evidence matrix without jumping between separate reports.
Run selected scan lanes on one domain and build a blended evidence package.
1 domain x many scansRun selected scan lanes across several domains and compare the results side by side.
Many domains x many scansSelected scan lanes
Compare is not locked to one generic score. Teams can choose the scan lanes that matter for the decision: search readiness, human access, crawl trust, privacy, security, forms, content, and supplier context.
Compare indexability, metadata, schema, crawl hints, SEO flags, critical fixes, and readiness movement.
Compare accessibility scores, issue counts, keyboard paths, labels, names, focus status, skip links, and measured coverage.
Compare HTTPS posture, mixed content, cookies, trackers, privacy signals, security headers, forms, status, and technical fetch fields.
Compare supplier counts, risky suppliers, shared peers, dependency movement, graph role, and third-party exposure.
Use cases
Power users need more than a single report. Compare gives operators, agencies, procurement teams, accessibility teams, and leadership a shared view of which domain is strongest, weakest, riskiest, or ready for handoff.
Line up company domains, business units, vendor portals, intranet-adjacent public sites, and critical web properties with the same evidence lanes.
Compare client domains, competitors, campaign sites, acquisition candidates, or remediation cohorts without rebuilding the same table by hand.
Compare supplier domains across accessibility, trust, privacy, technical posture, third-party dependencies, and reportable risk context.
Decision package
Compare is not just a chart. The portal keeps the comparison rules close to the output: selected scan lanes, evidence window, loaded domain slots, team assignment, owner, assigned user, notes, and export actions.
Compare exports preserve the selected domains, scanner lanes, score rings, retrieved rows, notes, ownership, and evidence window. Use Visual PDF for client review, Client-Safe PDF for polished outside sharing, JSON for systems, CSV for spreadsheet analysis, and TXT for quick ticket notes.
Workflow
Each step keeps the comparison usable: pick the domains, choose the scan lanes, set the date window, inspect the score rings, read the matrix, then export or assign the follow-up.
Choose saved Studies, List domains, or typed domains for up to five slots.
Choose the evidence lanes that matter for the comparison.
Use a standard range or custom dates to focus the evidence.
Use score rings and rows to see where domains differ.
Download or hand off the comparison with notes and ownership.
FAQ
Deep Dive runs multiple scan lanes on one domain. Compare lets teams choose scan lanes across multiple domains and review the results in a side-by-side table.
The portal Compare workspace is designed around side-by-side slots so teams can load several domains at once, including saved Studies, List domains, or manual domain entries.
Compare can show selected lanes such as Instant Crawl, SEO Readiness, Accessibility, and Link Graph, plus activity, trust scores, privacy, cookies, security headers, forms, content, and supplier context where available.
Yes. It is useful for vendor shortlists, procurement review, supplier-risk comparisons, accessibility posture review, and technical trust checks.
Yes. Compare supports report exports such as Visual PDF, Client-Safe PDF, raw PDF, JSON, CSV, and TXT where available.
Compare is built for power users, agencies, companies, analysts, accessibility teams, security teams, procurement teams, and operators who need to make evidence-backed decisions across multiple domains.
Make the decision visible
Bring the domains, evidence lanes, teams, and report audience. Kommento can help set up Compare views that show multiple scan results across multiple domains in one side-by-side decision workspace.